Return to guide introduction

Governance basics for start-ups and small companies

This page introduces IT governance for small companies, explaining why it matters, what it includes, and how to keep it lightweight and practical at an early stage.

Purpose of this page

Governance is how a company makes sure its technology decisions do not create avoidable risk. For small teams, this is less about formal committees and more about making sure someone knows who owns what, how decisions are made, and what happens when things go wrong.

Good governance reduces risk without slowing the business. It creates enough structure to avoid confusion and loss of control, while still allowing speed and experimentation. The goal is not to be perfect, but to prevent small issues from turning into expensive clean‑ups.

What governance is (and is not)

Governance is about clarity and accountability, not bureaucracy. It is a small set of decisions and rules that protect the company, its data, and its people. It should make the business easier to run, not harder.

Governance is not a legal framework and it is not a security hardening manual. You will still need legal advice for compliance and professional security support for complex risks. This guide helps you understand what to ask and when to seek help.

Core areas of governance

The core areas of governance for a small company are simple:

  • Identity and access control: who can access what, and how access is granted or removed.
  • Data ownership and retention: where data lives, who owns it, and how long it is kept.
  • Security practices and incident response: basic security expectations and what to do if something goes wrong.
  • Vendor and third‑party management: who you trust, what they can access, and how you exit.
  • Compliance awareness: knowing which regulations apply, even if you are not ready to fully implement them yet.

Policies and procedures

Policies translate governance into everyday behaviour. A small company only needs a few to start, but they should be written down and kept visible.

The early policies that matter most are:

  • Account and access: who can create accounts, how admin access is granted, and how access is removed.
  • Passwords and MFA: minimum password standards and which systems require MFA.
  • Device use: expectations for company and personal devices, including encryption and screen locks.
  • Data handling: where data can be stored and how it can be shared.
  • Software and updates: who can install software and how updates are handled.
  • AI usage: which AI tools are allowed and what data can be shared.

Keep policies short and practical. If the policy cannot be explained in a few sentences, it is too heavy for an early‑stage team. Policies only work when people can remember and follow them.

Risk and accountability

Governance works when risk is visible and ownership is clear. A simple risk register is enough. List the most likely or most damaging risks, rate them for likelihood and impact, and note what you are doing to reduce them.

Assign owners for key systems such as domains, email, finance tools, and core applications. The owner is accountable for keeping access up to date and for knowing where the critical credentials live.

Avoid single points of failure by ensuring at least two people can access critical systems. This does not mean everyone has admin access; it means the company is not locked out if one person leaves.

Incident response

Incidents happen. A lost laptop, leaked credentials, or a misconfigured system can expose data quickly. You do not need a full enterprise plan, but you do need a basic response playbook.

At minimum, decide:

  • Who is responsible for incident coordination and decision‑making
  • How you will detect issues (alerts, monitoring, or user reports)
  • How to contain access quickly (reset credentials, revoke tokens, disable accounts)
  • How you will communicate internally and externally if needed
  • Where you will record what happened and what you changed

After any incident, do a short review. Document the cause, the impact, and what you will change to reduce the risk next time. Even a lightweight approach builds resilience and reduces repeat mistakes.

Working with external providers

Many small companies rely on contractors, agencies, or consultants. This is normal, but it creates governance risk if access and ownership are not clear.

Before granting access, decide what a provider can do, which systems they need, and how long they should have access. Use individual accounts where possible, and avoid giving full admin access unless absolutely necessary.

Contracts should make it clear who owns the work product, who controls accounts, and what happens if the relationship ends. If you cannot remove a provider without losing access to your own systems, that is a governance failure.

Data protection and privacy (high level)

If you handle personal data, you need to treat it carefully. That starts with knowing what data you collect, why you collect it, and where it is stored.

Even if you are not legally required to comply with specific regulations yet, it helps to know which ones are likely to apply as you grow. If you handle sensitive data or operate in regulated industries, seek legal advice early.

How governance evolves over time

Governance needs change as the company grows. What works for a three-person team will not scale to ten or twenty without changes.

As you grow, policies will need to be formalised, access reviews should happen regularly, and documentation becomes more important. A good signal that your setup is no longer enough is when people are unsure who owns a system, or when critical changes happen without review.

When to pause and get help

Get help if you are unsure who owns critical systems, if you cannot explain who has access to what, or if a provider controls key parts of your business. These are signs that governance is too weak for the risks you face.

Good advice should clarify options and trade-offs, not overwhelm you with frameworks. A short check-in can often prevent months of cleanup later, and it is usually cheaper than fixing mistakes after they have compounded.